[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#80867: marked as done (apt: Horrible speed measuring.)



Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:12:28 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1001229230427.23433B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Bug#80867: apt: Horrible speed measuring.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2000 23:57:17 +0000
>From kuantiko@escomposlinux.org Fri Dec 29 17:57:17 2000
Return-path: <kuantiko@escomposlinux.org>
Received: from 200-coru-x5.libre.retevision.es (relativistic) [62.83.56.200] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14C9Oe-0003UA-00; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 17:57:17 -0600
Received: by relativistic (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5CAD82C61F; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:57:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesús Carrete Montaña <kuantiko@escomposlinux.org>
Subject: apt: Horrible speed measuring.
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20001229235709.5CAD82C61F@relativistic>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:57:09 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: apt
Version: 0.3.19
Severity: normal

I use a 56K modem, and quite often apt-get gives me wrong measures of speed:
up to 5000M/s!!! I also think time stimation is much improvable, because it
only evaluates the very current speed, and evaluating a certain period of time
would be more realistic.


-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux relativistic 2.4.0-test12-withoutfb #1 sáb dic 23 02:39:30 CET 2000 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6          2.2-6          GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libstdc++2.10  2.95.2-14      The GNU stdc++ library

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80867-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2000 06:12:30 +0000
>From jgg@debian.org Sat Dec 30 00:12:30 2000
Return-path: <jgg@debian.org>
Received: from (cast-ext.ab.videon.ca) [206.75.216.34] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14CFFm-0005PV-00; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:12:30 -0600
Received: (qmail 16148 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2000 06:12:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender <jgg@debian.org>)
          by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <kuantiko@escomposlinux.org>; 30 Dec 2000 06:12:29 -0000
Received: from localhost
	([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
	by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 14CFFk-00066N-00; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:12:28 -0700
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:12:28 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs_Carrete_Monta=F1a?= <kuantiko@escomposlinux.org>, 
    80867-done@bugs.debian.org
cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#80867: apt: Horrible speed measuring.
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20001229235709.5CAD82C61F@relativistic>
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1001229230427.23433B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Delivered-To: 80867-done@bugs.debian.org


On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Jes=FAs Carrete Monta=F1a wrote:

> I use a 56K modem, and quite often apt-get gives me wrong measures of spe=
ed:
> up to 5000M/s!!! I also think time stimation is much improvable, because =
it
> only evaluates the very current speed, and evaluating a certain period of=
 time
> would be more realistic.

Does your clock work? (and/or kernel)

That is the only time I have ever heard of anything like that.

Jason



Reply to: