Re: Processed: Re: your mail
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Anyhow, I have no idea what you are doing here, but I don't see how it can
> be an APT bug *unless* you are invoking APT from your post inst. (and
> using 'exec' too boot!)
Yeah, I am similarly puzzled, and of course, I don't run apt at all in my
postinst.
> Basically, there is no way that the dpkg sub process (the post inst
> script) would get a seg fault single from an APT proccess (the HTTP
> method). The trace from dpkg can only happen if bash (your postinst
> script) segs.
Agreed.
> I think it is more likely that the core file the submitter found is an old
> one or corrupt or something and that the debconf core file is actually
> still lurking someplace else.
>
> I'd also say that the core file itself looks bogus by the backtrace - that
> sequence of call events never happens in APT.
Hm. So do you want to reassign this back to debconf?
--
see shy jo
Reply to: