Bug#41038: marked as done (apt: apt-get says incorrect dependency)
Your message dated Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:07:35 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990709090053.13070C-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Bug#41038: apt: apt-get says incorrect dependency
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 1999 07:49:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 18672 invoked from network); 9 Jul 1999 07:49:35 -0000
Received: from mail.dmc.okinawa-ric.or.jp (210.142.128.99)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 1999 07:49:35 -0000
Received: from localhost by mail.dmc.okinawa-ric.or.jp (8.8.8/3.7W) id QAA08981; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:49:07 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[🔎] 199907090749.QAA08981@mail.dmc.okinawa-ric.or.jp>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt: apt-get says incorrect dependency
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on Emacs 20.3 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 16:48:33 +0900
From: Hiroshi KISE <fuyuneko@ryukyu.ne.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100)
Lines: 59
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.11
I try to install liburi-perl using apt-get, apt-get says
`libmime-base64-perl is not installed'. But libmime-base64-perl is
already installed. apt-get should say:
liburi-perl: Depends: perl but it is not installed
------------------------( C U T H E R E )---------------------------
# apt-cache showpkg liburi-perl
Package: liburi-perl
Versions: 1.03-1(/var/state/apt/lists/debian.softagency.co.jp_debian_dists_potato_main_binary-i386_Packages),1.01-1(/var/state/apt/lists/ftp.TokyoNet.AD.JP_pub_Linux_debian_dists_potato_main_binary-i386_Packages),
Reverse Depends:
libwww-perl,liburi-perl
netscape-base-ja-4,liburi-perl
netscape-base-4,liburi-perl
libwww-perl,liburi-perl
debiandoc-sgml,liburi-perl
dailyupdate,liburi-perl
Dependencies:
1.03-1 - perl (2 5.004) libmime-base64-perl (0 (null)) libnet-perl (0 (null)) data-dumper (0 (null)) libwww-perl (2 5.41) libwww-perl (3 5.41)
1.01-1 - perl (2 5.004) libmime-base64-perl (0 (null)) libnet-perl (0 (null)) data-dumper (0 (null)) libwww-perl (2 5.41) libwww-perl (3 5.41)
Provides:
1.03-1 -
1.01-1 -
Reverse Provides:
# dpkg -l libmime-base64-perl perl
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-===============-==============-============================================
ii libmime-base64- 2.11-2 MIME/Base64 decoding for Perl
pn perl <none> (no description available)
# apt-get install liburi-perl
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
liburi-perl: Depends: libmime-base64-perl but it is not installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
------------------------( C U T H E R E )---------------------------
Packages version:
ii apt 0.3.11 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.1.1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii libstdc++2.9-gl 2.91.66-2 The GNU stdc++ library (EGCS version)
rc dpkg-dev 1.4.1.3 Package building tools for Debian Linux
Reply to: