[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#38424: marked as done (apt: APT removes packages, when I don't want that)



Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 1999 21:39:44 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.3.96.990623213925.30611H-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Closed..
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 1999 18:36:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 5958 invoked from network); 27 May 1999 18:36:40 -0000
Received: from aragorn.ics.muni.cz (147.251.4.33)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 May 1999 18:36:40 -0000
Received: from anxur.fi.muni.cz (0@anxur.fi.muni.cz [147.251.48.3])
	by aragorn.ics.muni.cz (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA03879
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 May 1999 20:36:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from phantom.fi.muni.cz (mail@phantom.fi.muni.cz [147.251.51.15])
	by anxur.fi.muni.cz (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA06790;
	Thu, 27 May 1999 20:36:27 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from kabi by phantom.fi.muni.cz with local (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian))
	id 10n51x-0001eh-00; Thu, 27 May 1999 20:37:25 +0200
From: Zdenek Kabelac <kabi@informatics.muni.cz>
Subject: apt: APT removes packages, when I don't want that
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.8
Message-Id: <E10n51x-0001eh-00@phantom.fi.muni.cz>
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 20:37:25 +0200

Package: apt
Version: 0.3.6

OK

after a long time I've again exprimentated with APT - and again I have
same problems.

To be more precise - I want to reinstall telnetd-ssl - this apears to be
impossible currently, because there are wrong dependencies on ssleay instead
of on openssl. However openssl should be a replacement for ssleay.

Now I see this message in my log:

The following packages will be REMOVED:
  telnetd-ssl 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  openssl 
    
    
I even think, this is serious bug, because when I run unstable system,
there are for some moments, when there are some dependencies wrong and I don't
want to lose half of my system, because of wrong dependence on e.g. libc.

I definitely think that I'm a lord of my machine and when I say it should
be doing that, than I expect it should be that (I don't need another 
WindowsOS which thinks its smarter than me), I have not asked APT to
remove this package - so how about some switch before APT consider
to remove some package ? (not even mentioning APT refuses to install 
telned-ssl after this silent remove - I don't think that force options
are obsoleted)

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux phantom 2.0.37.RTL1.1-2000Hz #2 Èt Bøe 18 17:56:53 CET 1999 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6           2.1.1-7        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii  libc6           2.1.1-7        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii  libstdc++2.9-gl 2.91.66-2      The GNU stdc++ library (EGCS version)


Reply to: