Bug#39926: marked as done (apt downloading an already installed package?)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:38:43 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990622183617.22784B-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Bug#39926: apt downloading an already installed package?
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 1999 07:31:39 +0000
Received: (qmail 13303 invoked from network); 22 Jun 1999 07:31:38 -0000
Received: from perv.daft.com (1000@204.122.30.2)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 1999 07:31:38 -0000
Received: (from torin@localhost)
by perv.daft.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id AAA31403;
Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:31:36 -0700
Sender: torin@perv.daft.com
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt downloading an already installed package?
Organization: Discordian Alliance For Teaching
X-Web: http://www.daft.com/~torin/
X-Discordia: Hail Eris - keep up OM
X-Address: 2608 Second Avenue, #282
Seattle, WA 98121-1212
USA
X-Phone-Fax: +1-800-921-4996/+1-206-727-5084
X-Face: @E5e"O[(T!v&8{hyJLrPQnww-"r;+642m"aAJi~H2t#QCQj)UkGNh4FL,;\sc{e[]|MXbF|
*A+F|~XOY2JP'Bvk_.Gd{W0$/y5i<"X0y4%0S5GA6S\&/$P@Dgcr~cT1p6,op6N}#{A\0>9CaWy]a)
].L1j39flY?{z;KeP
From: "Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." <torin@daft.com>
Date: 22 Jun 1999 00:31:35 -0700
Message-ID: <[🔎] 87g13kd73c.fsf@perv.daft.com>
Lines: 61
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.7
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Well, I was upgrading my machine to the newer libc6 and friends when I
found out about the #! /Bin/sh tzconfig bug. Since I've got a fast
connection, I figured I'd just use apt-get dist-upgrade (well -d
followed by). This way, I'd be on the cutting edge.
During the download, xfree86-common conflicted with some file in
afterstep. Afterstep was installed for someone who had left the lab. I
deleted afterstep. I then ran apt-get dist-upgrade again.
I got the following:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libgimp1.1.6 xpilot-server librecode0 libmikmod1 liblockfile1
The following packages have been kept back
lilo mysql-client apache-common amanda-common apache libapache-mod-perl apache-dev apache-doc amanda-client
102 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded.
18 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 283kB/63.5MB of archives. After unpacking 1167kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org potato/main perl-base 5.004.04-7 [283kB]
Fetched 283kB in 5s (49.6kB/s)
This concerned me a bit since I know that I didn't upload a new
perl-base package and that's the latest one anyway:
ii perl-base 5.004.04-7 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
As you may guess, my machines stay at the latest Perl level.
What happened?
Darren
- --
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI/Pilot programmer/tutor @
@ Make a little hot-tub in your soul. @
- -- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux broca 2.0.36 #2 Sun Nov 29 02:38:59 PST 1998 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii libstdc++2.9-gl 2.91.66-2 The GNU stdc++ library (EGCS version)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBN287xo4wrq++1Ls5AQHf5wQAki95v7bPUazsi1d2Cj+r0dT5HjjRelSg
0kXIYR6IgiQ6Xjn6bCAgg4D8Y9q/IN9OjjmbsbrQWSn0M2220VBFeSXwB6Q8bEZD
FDbh6iaOOUy2Z91HPKGuBFbakknhYK1NhOwPD3stMnJbDr77qcG6WrVQQ1564x3W
6O3WwXCvA2c=
=0KMX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: