[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#34296: marked as done (/etc/apt/sources.list is a conffile)



Your message dated Sat, 20 Mar 1999 02:57:41 -0600 (CST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.3.96.990320024921.891T-100000@doogie.p2.private.novare.net>
and subject line Uploaded apt 0.3.2 (source i386 all) to master (fwd)
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 1999 19:17:05 +0000
Received: (qmail 5230 invoked from network); 9 Mar 1999 19:17:04 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 1999 19:17:04 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA12808
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:16:57 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA07130
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:16:58 +0100
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:16:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Debian Bugs <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: /etc/apt/sources.list is a conffile
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990309201145.28864A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Package: apt
Version: 0.1.9

/etc/apt/sources.list is a conffile in the dpkg sense.

Since this file is commonly changed by the user to point to a near Debian
mirror, dpkg asks very often about replacing this file by the version
provided inside the .deb, which is not usually what the user wants.
Normally the user ends up answering No all the time.

A better approach, IMHO, would be to create this file in the postinst,
only when it does not exist.

This way, upgrading apt would be completely smooth.

Thanks.

-- 
 "82de41dbcd2e7dd210e66f02e490c60a" (a truly random sig)


Reply to: