Re: Gnome-apt and apt 0.3.1
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote:
> >
> > > > We need to make the APT package provide the virtual package libapt-pkg2.1
> > > > and then have gnome-apt depend on that instead. Please do that if you are
> > > > going to do anything..
> > >
> > > I have deliberately avoided touching anything in the apt cvs tree. Does
> > > this mean that I have permission to change the control files for apt in
> > > cvs? (Don't wanna piss anybody off)
> >
> > Sure go crazy, but if you make an error we get to tar and feather you :>
> > Just keep the changelog uptodate and be sure the provides: is in sync..
>
> We need more than the Provides: to be in sync.
> I found that the symlink in libapt-pkg-dev was still pointing to
> libapt-pkg.2.0 even though we are now at 2.2.
Oh this all sounds very nice! Go ahead
Jason
Reply to: