[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Roman.Hodek@informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Roman Hodek)] Uploaded apt 0.1.9.0.1 (m68k) to erlangen



Should I be concerned about this?

-- 
Brought to you by the letters Z and O and the number 12.
"You have my pills!"
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer of Gimp and GTK+ -- http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet/Open Projects IRC as Che_Fox.
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Resent-Date: 14 Jan 1999 08:51:25 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Message-Id: <m100iUP-000553C@kullervo>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:50:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman.Hodek@informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Roman Hodek)
Apparently-To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Subject: Uploaded apt 0.1.9.0.1 (m68k) to erlangen
Resent-Message-ID: <"SMEvbC.A.kzG.MAbn2"@murphy>
To: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Resent-From: debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:15:08 +0100
Source: apt
Binary: apt
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.1.9.0.1
Distribution: frozen
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <roman@m68k.debian.org>
Description: 
 apt        - Front-End for dpkg
Changes: 
 apt (0.1.9.0.1) frozen; urgency=low
 .
   * Binary-only non-maintainer upload to get rid of libstdc++2.8 dependency.
     Only recompilation, no changes to sources.
Files: 
 fb78e7a5f0cab8de8e96d5dfd74209b1 328188 admin optional apt_0.1.9.0.1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAwUBNp2u/3VhJ0HiWnvJAQGlsgP6AlkW/IfQRcJ9DdNgbcAsjsy3UceAgt30
BxNWl4YsWWyWQPuJ6kpdOOJ+Sc1bl1XoVmmakMqmEqLWkUE79hFLVIneH1kzc1Mo
tl2vtgF3p2fmY65XGzDNyfMg1KZV2T9pmWTzu9W8O7ce+wKziQ47vd8o7E+UJ9O4
uaviuXkgGHg=
=/CI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

------- End of forwarded message -------


Reply to: