Re: Bug#31747: apt: libc6 version number problem
On Jan 11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> > Drawback: the libc6 version number is the same in slink and potato.
> > Unless apt isn't going in slink at all, it's not going to work at all
>
> Eh? Espy is not putting that weird 1998 version in slink is he?? If so
> then he really should use a . not a - like I suggested. The new version
> code could very well break some other cases it has not been as tested.
>From /usr/doc/glibc/changelog.Debian.gz:
glibc (2.0.7-19981211-1) frozen unstable; urgency=low
...
So, yeah, it's in slink too (I'm using potato, but it definitely went
into both slink and potato).
Chris
--
=============================================================================
| Chris Lawrence | My home page: |
| <quango@watervalley.net> | http://www.clark.net/pub/lawrencc/ |
| | |
| Grad Student, Pol. Sci. | This address has been spam-proofed |
| University of Mississippi | All spam goes to your postmaster |
=============================================================================
Reply to: