Re: Bug#31747: apt: libc6 version number problem
On Jan 11, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca> writes:
>
> Jason> This is already fixed in APT cvs and in APTv3.
>
> Jason> Ben, we should probably release a new APT 0.1 into potato -
> Jason> I think the changes are large enough to not put it into
> Jason> slink.
>
> I will work on this this week.
Drawback: the libc6 version number is the same in slink and potato.
Unless apt isn't going in slink at all, it's not going to work at all
in slink in its current state (apt -f doesn't clear up the dependency
problems that the version ordering problem is causing). So at least
the version number checking needs to be patched for apt in slink.
Chris
--
=============================================================================
| Chris Lawrence | My home page: |
| <quango@watervalley.net> | http://www.clark.net/pub/lawrencc/ |
| | |
| Amiga A4000/060 with | Watch Babylon 5 on TNT |
| Linux/m68k 2.1.127 | <*> http://tnt.turner.com/babylon5/ <*> |
=============================================================================
Reply to: