Forwarded message from Fabrizio Polacco, 11:05:13 Sun,14 June 1998
Hi guys,
Could we have a manual page for the ftp method or something?
You can get the manual page by saying pod2man methods/ftp/ftp >
apt-ftpmethod.1 or something (I'll leave the name and placement to
you guys)
manoj
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 87ogvz7riu.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>; from Manoj Srivastava on Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 12:54:49PM -0500
Organization: PROSA PROgettazione Sviluppo Aperto srl
From: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi>
Sender: Fabrizio Polacco <fab@icenet.fi>
To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#23417: apt: possible problem with passive ftp mode
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 11:05:13 +0300
On Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 12:54:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> FTP(1) User Contributed Perl Documentation FTP(1)
>
>
> NAME
> ftp - The plug in FTP method for APT
>
>
> SYNOPSIS
> % ftp FTP_URI file [[FTP_URI file]...]
> ...
Manoj,
where does this manpage come from?
I can see only these in the apt package:
/usr/man/man8/apt-get.8.gz
/usr/man/man8/apt-cache.8.gz
/usr/man/man5/ftp.conf.5.gz
/usr/man/man5/sources.list.5.gz
oh, I see, I can get it with pod2man /usr/lib/apt/methods/ftp
Anyway, I suggest to modify it to have a different name, as ftp(1) is
the old'n'usual client. Also add "apt" as a subsection (I will add it
in the slink's man-db list).
fab
--
| fpolacco@icenet.fi fpolacco@debian.org fpolacco@prosa.it
| 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
> PROSA ltd - the first commercial firm enterely open-source oriented
| support the open-source initiative! http://www.opensource.org/
--
"Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo." Wells
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: