[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#534633: Bug#534633: Bug#534633: xfce4-terminal: If shell prompt >screen width, entry line becomes garbled
- Subject: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#534633: Bug#534633: Bug#534633: xfce4-terminal: If shell prompt >screen width, entry line becomes garbled
- From: corsac at debian.org (Yves-Alexis Perez)
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:48:03 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1247813283.17144.44.camel@hidalgo>
- In-reply-to: <1246360820.19917.2.camel@miria>
- References: <20090625223801.17155.3811.reportbug@daniloth.fionavar.dd> <1245996083.29367.2.camel@hidalgo> <20090630070851.1b3904ad@daniloth.fionavar.dd> <1246360820.19917.2.camel@miria>
On mar, 2009-06-30 at 13:20 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar, 2009-06-30 at 07:08 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:01:23 +0200
> > Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On jeu, 2009-06-25 at 18:38 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If you have a long prompt string such that the line exceeds the
> > > > screen width (.e.g due to using current working directory in the
> > > > prompt), the display becomes garbled on the line entry.
> > >
> > > Can you make a screenshot, because I don't really see what you mean
> > > and can't really reproduce.
> >
> > Attached. I typed 'this is what happens, erased 'this is' and retyped
> > it. The result is what you see.
>
> Hmhm, that's weird. I tried to reproduce (using bash default config) and
> I failed. It might be related to your shell and the colors, but I'm not
> sure how. Could you tell us which shell you use and provide us your
> PS1/PROMPT config? (it's a wild guess, but?)
Ping? Can you explain me how to reproduce? In the meantime you might
want to try with xfce4-terminal 0.2.90-1 or 0.2.99.1-1
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/attachments/20090717/953b2c91/attachment.pgp>
Reply to: