[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#56179: marked as done (xspecs: XKB source format is poorly (or non-) documented)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:20:15 +0100
with message-id <20110114222015.GA31121@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#56179: xspecs: XKB source format is poorly (or non-) documented
has caused the Debian Bug report #56179,
regarding xspecs: XKB source format is poorly (or non-) documented
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
56179: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56179
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 3.3.4-0slink2

I can't find any documentation of the source format used by xkbcomp.  This
makes sorting out definitions for new keyboards a little tricky.  Is it
documented anywhere?

-- 
Ben Harris
Unix Support, University of Cambridge Computing Service.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> (13/03/2007):
> Closing since XKB seems pretty well documented nowadays (more than
> 250 pages in XKBlib.ps.gz and XKBproto.ps.gz).

Let's point to:
  xorg-docs: /usr/share/doc/xorg-docs/input/XKB-Enhancing.{html,pdf,txt}

KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: