Bug#531797: request for more information
sean finney writes:
> tags 531800 unreproducable
> severity 531800 important
> thanks
>
> hi giacomo,
>
> i can't reproduce this problem (and i'm also running 2.6.29/amd64).
i'm running an AMD cpu, but debian's architecture is i386
> are you sure you don't have a compiz component installed from source,
> a non-standard library installed or perhaps something from experimental?
i don't know
> the following information would be helpful:
>
> echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
,----[ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH ]
|
,----
(that is, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is unset)
> cat /etc/ld.so.conf /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*
,----[ cat /etc/ld.so.conf /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* ]
| include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf
|
| /usr/lib/3dnow/atlas
| /usr/lib/3dnow
| /usr/lib/atlas
| # Multiarch support
| /lib/i486-linux-gnu
| /usr/lib/i486-linux-gnu
| # libc default configuration
| /usr/local/lib
`----
> sudo updatedb && locate libcompizconfig.so | xargs ldd
,----[ sudo updatedb && locate libcompizconfig.so | xargs ldd ]
| /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0:
| linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb8028000)
| /usr/lib/libtsocks.so (0xb7fd5000)
| libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0xb7e8a000)
| libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7d6b000)
| libprotobuf.so.3 => /usr/lib/libprotobuf.so.3 (0xb7c91000)
| libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7ba0000)
| libm.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7b7a000)
| libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7a1a000)
| libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb79ee000)
| libdl.so.2 => /lib/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb79e9000)
| libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb79d4000)
| libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xb79bb000)
| /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb8029000)
| libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xb79b8000)
| libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0xb79b3000)
| /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0:
| linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb8019000)
| /usr/lib/libtsocks.so (0xb7fc6000)
| libxml2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0xb7e7b000)
| libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7d5c000)
| libprotobuf.so.3 => /usr/lib/libprotobuf.so.3 (0xb7c82000)
| libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7b91000)
| libm.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7b6b000)
| libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7a0b000)
| libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb79df000)
| libdl.so.2 => /lib/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb79da000)
| libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb79c5000)
| libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xb79ac000)
| /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb801a000)
| libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xb79a9000)
| libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0xb79a4000)
`----
>
> dpkg -l '*compiz*'
,----
| Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
| |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
| ||/ Name Version Description
| +++-=================================-============================-============================================
| pn compiz <none> (no description available)
| ii compiz-core 0.8.2-6 OpenGL window and compositing manager
| un compiz-core-abiversion-20090207 <none> (no description available)
| ii compiz-dev 0.8.2-6 OpenGL window and compositing manager - deve
| ii compiz-fusion-bcop 0.8.2-1 Compiz Fusion option code generator
| ii compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.8.2-3 Compiz Fusion plugins - extra collection
| ii compiz-fusion-plugins-main 0.8.2-3 Compiz Fusion plugins - main collection
| ii compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported 0.8.2-1 Compiz Fusion plugins - "unsupported" collec
| pn compiz-gnome <none> (no description available)
| ii compiz-gtk 0.8.2-6 OpenGL window and compositing manager - Gtk
| ii compiz-plugins 0.8.2-6 OpenGL window and compositing manager - plug
| pn compizconfig-backend-gconf <none> (no description available)
| ii compizconfig-settings-manager 0.8.2-2 Compizconfig Settings Manager
| ii libcompizconfig0 0.8.2-2 Configuration settings library for compiz-fu
| ii python-compizconfig 0.8.2-1 Compizconfig bindings for python
`----
> i'm going to check to see if there's anything that has recently
> happened in testing/unstable that i've somehow missed but this
> information will be helpful in any case. in the meantime i'm
> downgrading the bug.
thank you Sean
gb
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Reply to: