Bug#526260: xorg: cursor appears on all displays
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.4+1
Severity: normal
I have X configured with two screens (without Xinerama) like this:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "Default Layout"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
Screen 1 "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0"
...
Previously, the mouse cursor worked seamlessly across displays. After
upgrading to the newest xorg version, though, the cursor persists on the
inactive screen after moving across the display boundary. It's as if
the last displayed position on the previous screen isn't erased when it
hops to the next screen.
This doesn't interfere with normal operations, it's just annoying :-).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xorg depends on:
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.4-2 A free implementation of the OpenG
ii libglu1-mesa 7.4-2 The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii rxvt-unicode [x-terminal-emul 9.06-1 RXVT-like terminal emulator with U
ii x11-apps 7.3+4 X applications
ii x11-session-utils 7.3+1 X session utilities
ii x11-utils 7.4+1 X11 utilities
ii x11-xfs-utils 7.4+1 X font server utilities
ii x11-xkb-utils 7.4+2 X11 XKB utilities
ii x11-xserver-utils 7.4+2 X server utilities
ii xauth 1:1.0.3-2 X authentication utility
ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-4 100 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-4 75 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-6 standard fonts for X
ii xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-6 scalable fonts for X
ii xfonts-utils 1:7.4+1 X Window System font utility progr
ii xinit 1.1.1-1 X server initialisation tool
ii xkb-data 1.5-2 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii xserver-xorg 1:7.4+1 the X.Org X server
ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 242-1 X terminal emulator
Versions of packages xorg recommends:
ii xorg-docs 1:1.4-4 Miscellaneous documentation for th
xorg suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
Reply to: