Bug#334461: xdm problem

[Ian Zimmerman <nobrowser@gmail.com>]

Justin> Hi Ian, Do you know what the more general problem is?  I guess
Justin> it could be that s-s-d requires that the /proc/ "exe" name
Justin> matches, and it may not, because xdm moved between
Justin> /usr/bin/X11/xdm and /usr/X11R6/bin/xdm.  Is that what you
Justin> think?

That was another thing I suspected, but both start and stop uses
--exec /usr/bin/X11/xdm, which is the real executable not a symlink.
One more theory bites dust :-)

-- 
A true pessimist won't be discouraged by a little success.