[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#245919: Radeon 7500 + CRT, display washed out



retitle 245919 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] CRT display too bright on Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon 7500] rev 0
tag 245919 + upstream
merge 245919 234025
# we still need someone to test that patch
tag 234025 + moreinfo
thanks

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:27:35AM -0000, sacrificial-spam-address@horizon.com wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> 
> Briefly, starting X on this Debian/unstable, x86, kernel 2.6.5 system
> produces a display reminiscent of gamma set *way* too high.
> Bright, washed-out, and illegible.
> 
> Earlier versions worked perfectly, although I don't have an archive
> to find exactly where it broke.
> 
> If I set the display gamma to 0.4, I end up with a display that just
> looks like Arizona summer at high noon and I want sunglasses.
> I.e. black text on white is legible, even if it's an awfully pale black.
> 
> This appears to be the same bug talked about in
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/rh-xf/msg01127.html
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2004-01/1739.html
> and possibly
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/xfree86-list/2003-October/msg00003.html

And also:

http://bugs.debian.org/234025

...which has already been filed.

> There is some talk there of a fix in CVS, which would be very helpful.

Patches to XFree86 CVS are not always available to us due to XFree86's
license change.

> Thank you very much for any assistance; I'm a little wary of trying
> to compile xfree86 from CVS.

If you're willing to patch and compile XFree86 from Debian's packages,
you could help us out tremendously in resolving this bug!

Please see

http://bugs.debian.org/234025

for more information.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    belly laugh.
branden@debian.org                 |    -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: