On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:43AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi Branden,
>
> I wrote:
> One problem with latest XKB bugreports (changes in X 4.3) is that we
> do not know if xlibs has to be blamed, or if other apps are modifying
> XKB settings. In order to reproduce the reported bugs, I slightly
> hacked setxkbmap.c to ignore current server settings. If a -noserver
> command-line flag is added (patch attached), we could ask submitters
> to run a setxkbmap command and determine if this bug belongs to xlibs.
> and you requested a bugreport in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x-0404/msg00796.html
> I would like to read your comments before patching documentation ;)
I'd call the option and local variable "ignoreserver" instead of
"noserver". ("noserver" could lead to thoughts like as "What? I don't
*have* an X server? What am I doing running an X client, then?")
Other than that, I don't see any problems.
Thanks a lot for working on this!
--
G. Branden Robinson | If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux | thinking, they'll love you; but if
branden@debian.org | you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hate you. -- Don Marquis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature