[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#67309: marked as done (xlibs-data: [xkb] Hungarian symbols file incorrect with respect to otilde and ucircumflex)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:39:37 +0200
with message-id <20040416193937.GA2562@linuxfr.org>
and subject line xlibs-data: Bug #67309 fixed: Hungarian symbols file incorrect
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2000 15:22:48 +0000
>From dlux@spam.sch.bme.hu Sun Jul 16 10:22:48 2000
Return-path: <dlux@spam.sch.bme.hu>
Received: from spam.sch.bme.hu [152.66.226.210] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13DqFj-0007GW-00; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 10:22:48 -0500
Received: from dlux by spam.sch.bme.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 13DqFq-0005qt-00; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:22:54 +0200
From: dlux@dlux.hu
Subject: xlib6g: Wrong symbols information for Hungarian Keyboards
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4
Message-Id: <E13DqFq-0005qt-00@spam.sch.bme.hu>
Sender: dLux <dlux@spam.sch.bme.hu>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:22:54 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: xlib6g
Version: 3.3.6-5
Severity: normal

When I use "setxkbmap hu", it cannot write "õ" and "û" symbols.

Someone in the "www.linux.hu" site has contributed a corrected version, please put it into the deb package!

The correct symbol file: http://spam.sch.bme.hu/~dlux/xkbsym/hu

Please use this file instead of the current version (/usr/lib/X11/xkb/symbols/hu).

Regards,
dLux

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux spam 2.2.17pre10-dlux #1 SMP Thu Jul 6 00:02:33 CEST 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages xlib6g depends on:
hi  xfree86-common 3.3.6-5        X Window System (XFree86) infrastructure
ii  libc6          2.1.3-10       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 67309-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 19:37:03 +0000
>From barbier@linuxfr.org Fri Apr 16 12:37:03 2004
Return-path: <barbier@linuxfr.org>
Received: from smtp-105-friday.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net) [62.4.17.105] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BEZ95-0001Fs-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:37:03 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (sinibar.net1.nerim.net [62.4.18.43])
	by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2539A62E7A
	for <67309-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 667F023F65; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:39:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:39:37 +0200
To: 67309-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: xlibs-data: Bug #67309 fixed: Hungarian symbols file incorrect
Message-ID: <20040416193937.GA2562@linuxfr.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: barbier@linuxfr.org (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: 67309-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Hi,

as far as I can tell, otilde and ucircumflex are defined for many
variants of the hu layout.  Moreover the given URL with the desired
keyboard definition does no more exist.
For these reasons, I am closing this bug; if you have still trouble
with your keyboard layout, please file a new one with your current
settings.

Denis



Reply to: