Bug#119023: marked as done (xlibs: [xkb] us_intl symbols file not aware of windows keys)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:36:26 +0200
with message-id <20040415213626.GA4087@linuxfr.org>
and subject line xlibs: old bug no more present
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2001 18:38:46 +0000
>From nick@debian.org Sat Nov 10 12:38:46 2001
Return-path: <nick@debian.org>
Received: from a200042115007.rev.prima.com.ar (newton) [200.42.115.7] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 162d1h-0002Mo-00; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:38:45 -0600
Received: from nick by newton with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian GNU/Linux))
id 162d4l-0000HR-00; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:41:55 -0300
From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>
Subject: xlibs: Bug in us_intl mapping, I think..
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <E162d4l-0000HR-00@newton>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:41:55 -0300
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.1.0-9
Severity: normal
By default , or when I do (xkbsel us), the left windows key is mapped to
Meta_L (seen with xev):
KeyPress event, serial 28, synthetic NO, window 0x2200001,
root 0x38, subw 0x0, time 395282608, (172,-8), root:(185,22),
state 0x0, keycode 115 (keysym 0xffe7, Meta_L), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 characters: ""
When I select (with xkbsel) us_intl, the left windows key it isn't:
KeyPress event, serial 28, synthetic NO, window 0x2200001,
root 0x38, subw 0x0, time 395239357, (595,507), root:(608,537),
state 0x0, keycode 115 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 characters: ""
This should work so as to use the windos key to control the window manager
(sawfish in my case).
Thanks!
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux newton 2.4.9 #1 sáb sep 15 17:42:13 ART 2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages xlibs depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libfreetype6 2.0.2.20010514 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii xfree86-common 4.1.0-7 X Window System (XFree86) infrastructure
ii xlibs 4.1.0-9 X Window System client libraries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 119023-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2004 21:33:53 +0000
>From barbier@linuxfr.org Thu Apr 15 14:33:53 2004
Return-path: <barbier@linuxfr.org>
Received: from smtp-104-thursday.nerim.net (kraid.nerim.net) [62.4.16.104]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BEEUb-00043k-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:33:53 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (sinibar.net1.nerim.net [62.4.18.43])
by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD44418E0
for <119023-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:33:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 86D6524A6D; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:36:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:36:26 +0200
To: 119023-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: xlibs: old bug no more present
Message-ID: <20040415213626.GA4087@linuxfr.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: barbier@linuxfr.org (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: 119023-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Hi,
this bug does not exist with xfree86 4.3, so I am closing it.
Denis
Reply to: