[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: I GOT A PROBLEM



On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:39:22PM +0800, root wrote:
> TO : Debian X Strike Force
> 
> I got a problem when I "apt-get upgrade" my system .
> 
> below is error output
>             sorry to disturb you   Sincerely yours.
> 
> 讀取套件清單中... Done
> 了解套件依存關係中... Done
> 更正依存關係中... 完成
> 下列的【新】套件都將被安裝:
>   libxft-dev
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   libxft-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 刪除 0 個套件,另不更新 4 個套件。
> 需要下載 60.2kB 中 0B 的檔案。
> 解壓縮後將空出 4096B 的空間。
> 繼續執行嗎? 是按 [Y] 鍵,否按 [n] 鍵 
> (Reading database ... 165414 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (using
> .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
> diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
> Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to
> /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev'
> dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting
> `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h' with
>   different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb (--unpack):
>  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Please see:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=237509
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=237511
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240302
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241008

...for explanations and workarounds.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     Never attribute to human stupidity
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     that which can be adequately
branden@debian.org                 |     explained by GNU Libtool.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Scott James Remnant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: