[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#242046: marked as done (libxv1: Installation conflicts with xlibs 4.3.0-XD2.2)



Your message dated Tue, 6 Apr 2004 03:02:37 -0500
with message-id <20040406080237.GR7764@deadbeast.net>
and subject line Bug#242046: libxv1: Installation conflicts with xlibs 4.3.0-XD2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2004 14:07:28 +0000
>From fionn@home.fionn.de Sun Apr 04 07:07:28 2004
Return-path: <fionn@home.fionn.de>
Received: from fionet.com (service.fionet.com) [217.172.181.68] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BA8HY-0002ky-00; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 07:07:28 -0700
Received: from pd955b836.dip.t-dialin.net
	([217.85.184.54] helo=rtfm ident=ident)
	by service.fionet.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BA8HW-0002fM-00; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 16:07:26 +0200
Received: from fionn by rtfm with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BA8HT-0006hD-00; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 16:07:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Fionn Behrens <debian-io@fionn.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libxv1: Installation conflicts with xlibs 4.3.0-XD2.2
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 16:07:23 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1BA8HT-0006hD-00@rtfm>
Sender: Fionn Behrens <fionn@home.fionn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: libxv1
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: normal

Unpacking libxv1 (from .../libxv1_4.3.0-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxv1_4.3.0-7_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXv.so.1.0', which is also in package xlibs
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0-XD2.2
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rtfm 2.6.4 #2 SMP Mon Mar 22 12:07:34 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242046-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 08:02:44 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Tue Apr 06 01:02:44 2004
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BAlXg-0004iD-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:44 -0700
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5847264232; Tue,  6 Apr 2004 03:02:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 03:02:37 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: 242046-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#242046: libxv1: Installation conflicts with xlibs 4.3.0-XD2.2
Message-ID: <20040406080237.GR7764@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] E1BA8HT-0006hD-00@rtfm> <[🔎] 20040404151237.GA15206@downhill.at.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="magLDk5D4XGaUXcd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040404151237.GA15206@downhill.at.eu.org>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 242046-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1


--magLDk5D4XGaUXcd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 05:12:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-04-04 Fionn Behrens <debian-io@fionn.de> wrote:
> > Package: libxv1
> > Version: 4.3.0-7
> > Severity: normal
>=20
> > Unpacking libxv1 (from .../libxv1_4.3.0-7_i386.deb) ...
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxv1_4.3.0-7_i386.deb =
(--unpack):
> >  trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libXv.so.1.0', which is also in pa=
ckage xlibs
> > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
>=20
> > Package: xlibs
> > Version: 4.3.0-XD2.2
> > Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
> [...]
>=20
> Afaik upgrades from experimental/inofficial packages (4.3.0-XD2.2) are
> not supported.

Andreas's diagnosis is correct.

You will either need to install the packages with the
"--force-overwrite" option to dpkg, or remove the experimental packages
"4.3.0-XD2.2" -- which I've never heard of before -- from your system
first.

Closing this bug.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |    Kissing girls is a goodness.  It is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    a growing closer.  It beats the
branden@debian.org                 |    hell out of card games.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Robert Heinlein

--magLDk5D4XGaUXcd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkByZBwACgkQ6kxmHytGonzVAACfYuHI8+LgSHNmsEvgEO10tLgE
t+QAniB5+lNJ/WYh0FKbTijsXA8FicLJ
=B+cK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--magLDk5D4XGaUXcd--



Reply to: