On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:59:48PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I thought about the latter as well. It's not too long-winded if we > > > expect having input and video modules with identical names. > > > > I can't particularly see this at the moment, but I'm sure something will > > rise up and prove us wrong. > > Yeah, well, if something turns out to be that perverse we'll just ad-hoc > it. > > I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an > existing name for a different purpose. Well, Synaptics could branch out and start making graphics cards, for example. -- Daniel Stone <daniels@debian.org> Debian X Strike Force: http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
Attachment:
pgpJJzTwsoyx5.pgp
Description: PGP signature