Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:54:05 -0400 with message-id <20140816145405.GA24366@mikado.tilapin.org> and subject line Re: Bug#182700: www.debian.org should link to apt-get.org (was: Re: I think it's mostly about communication) has caused the Debian Bug report #182700, regarding www.debian.org should link to apt-get.org (was: Re: I think it's mostly about communication) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 182700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=182700 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: www.debian.org should link to apt-get.org (was: Re: I think it's mostly about communication)
- From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 12:45:21 +0100
- Message-id: <1046346321.2346.109.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch>
- In-reply-to: <200302271205.31538.thomas.friedrichsmeier@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- References: <200302271205.31538.thomas.friedrichsmeier@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 12:05, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > Now, the good news is, of course, that you actually can have KDE 3.x on debian > (long before it finally entered sid), and same goes for openoffice and a lot > of other stuff that _people simply want to have_. And you can have it without > it being included in official stable. The one problem that remains is to > figure out, _how_ to get it. That's not a big problem, once you are You apparently don't know apt-get.org - they already maintain such a list. I'm filing a (wishlist) bug with the www.debian.org pseudopackage that the 'Getting Debain' page, or even the 'Getting Started' section of the title page should contain a hint like Some Software is not included in Debian for various reasons, but is nonetheless available as debian packages. apt-get.org maintains a list of such software. Something like that. cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/smtpAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: thomas.friedrichsmeier@ruhr-uni-bochum.de, 182700-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#182700: www.debian.org should link to apt-get.org (was: Re: I think it's mostly about communication)
- From: David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:54:05 -0400
- Message-id: <20140816145405.GA24366@mikado.tilapin.org>
- In-reply-to: <200303041835.23470.thomas.friedrichsmeier@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- References: <200303041835.23470.thomas.friedrichsmeier@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Control: tags -1 wontfix On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:35:22PM +0100, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:05:36 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:45:21PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > > I'm filing a (wishlist) bug with the www.debian.org pseudopackage that > > > the 'Getting Debain' page, or even the 'Getting Started' section of the > > > title page should contain a hint like > > I definitely object to saying that kind of thing anywhere near the sections > > for total newbies (unofficial repositories can break their systems), but > > yes, a link to apt-get.org should be added in a few places. > Instead of linking to apt-get.org directly, link to a new page "Using > unofficial repositories". That page would contain the following sections: As Jossip, I disagree that such information has its place in the official Debian website. Such advice might be considered (or not) in a document like the Debian reference, or simply go in the wiki if there is really a need for it (didn’t check if it were already). Regards DavidAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---