On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:35:17PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> That's a good question: I thought, since we offer the content in dual
> licensing (people who receive it are free to use it under the terms of
> the MIT *or* GPL2+), that we (the authors) have to offer it under both
> licenses (MIT *and* GPL2+), but my understanding of legal logic can be
> flawed.
It is actually correct: the "OR" is for the final recipients, the "AND"
is for the contributors that need to relicense their material.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o
Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature