Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:54:56 -0400 with message-id <[🔎] 4F1F28B0.20804@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2+ has caused the Debian Bug report #238245, regarding Open Publication License is not DFSG Free to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 238245: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=238245 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Debian WWW Pages License is incompatible with the GNU GPL
- From: Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@vega.ocn.ne.jp>
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 10:19:38 +0900 (JST)
- Message-id: <20030510.101938.124278171.05@tats.iris.ne.jp>
Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Debian WWW Pages are distributed under the Open Publication License. However, it is incompatible with the GNU GPL. I hope that the Debian WWW Pages will be clearly free and compatible with the GNU GPL. See also debian-legal archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200305/threads.html#00003 -- Tatsuya Kinoshita
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Stefano Zacchiroli <leader@debian.org>, 238245-done@bugs.debian.org, The Debian Web site <debian-www@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2+
- From: David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:54:56 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4F1F28B0.20804@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20120124094153.GA11557__48126.6294526451$1327398202$gmane$org@upsilon.cc>
- References: <[🔎] 4F1AEE97.9070202@debian.org> <20120124094153.GA11557__48126.6294526451$1327398202$gmane$org@upsilon.cc>
Le 24/01/2012 05:41, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > It seems we've consensus on the license choice \o/ > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:57:59PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: […] >> +<a href="legal/licenses/gpl2">GNU General Public License</a>; either >> +version??2 of the License, or any later version (the latest version is > ^^^ > as a minor nitpick, I would add "(at your option)" here. Sure, I thought it wasn't needed, thanks for the fix. > Looking forward for David to push the big red button :-) Done, it will be online in three or four hours (I pick tomorrow's date to be on the safe side). Thanks a lot Stefano for pushing to an accurate solution of this long standing issue. We'll soon update #388141 to document the status of pages that were edited before now, the relicensing workflow and alike, but I'm really happy to press now the big red button for this first step! Cheers DavidAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---