[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#511925: marked as done (www.debian.org: Error generating international/l10n/po-debconf/de)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:42:30 -0400
with message-id <4EFB8D46.8020606@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#511925: www.debian.org: Error generating international/l10n/po-debconf/de
has caused the Debian Bug report #511925,
regarding www.debian.org: Error generating international/l10n/po-debconf/de
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
511925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: Nicolas François <nekral.lists@gmail.com>

If you look at http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
and search for "rtpg", you see
a) The line has no colored background
b) The score is formated oddly (no semicolons and no u, i.e. (0t0f3)
instead of the expected (0t;0f;3u))

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Le 03/04/2011 15:02, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:27:15PM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:

>> for the packages which currently have no translation in the archive, but
>> whose translation started on the mailing list.
>>
>> Currently, these lines are white.
>> Would you prefer to have a different color?
> 
> Still yes. Even more so that the new design removed the cells for each
> entry.
> 
>> Here are different ideas:
>>   * red because it is not translated

> This would be ok (as an all fuzzy/now untranslated package is also
> indicated in red), also grey would do it.

I think grey would be less confusing to make it clear it's not the same
as “outdated in the archive”.

The change will be available online in a few hours.

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: