Le 15/12/2011 17:47, Justin B Rye a écrit :
> David Prévot wrote:
>> Ok, I agree that a list could make the purpose clearer
>> […] and ask Don if it's OK to commit the
>> attached patch. You can see the online result on my test server:
>>
>> http://www.tilapin.org/debian/Bugs/Developer.en#followup
[ Page updated with the attached patch ]
> One minor thing caught my eye in the original text just above
Thanks for spotting it, fix added to the patch.
> [...]
>> +<p>
>> +The bug tracking system will receive the
>> +message sent at the following addresses:
>> +</p>
>
> The English needs a bit of work there ("will receive messages sent to
> the following addresses"), but I'd prefer to reorganise things a bit
> more to make it obvious that it's saying that for all of the following
> addresses the minimum result is that the message will be filed in the
> BTS.
I wonder if the initial order has an implied meaning (aka “if you're not
sure, use the first one; if you feel like it doesn't fit your need, look
at the second one, etc.”), and in case we should respect this order
(keep the default address in the first position), I edited your proposal
(in bold what I've changed after your proposal so it may be easier to
spot error I introduced):
Messages can be sent to the following addresses
*in order to be filed in the bug tracking system*:
nnn@bugs.debian.org — *such messages* are also sent to the package
maintainer and forwarded to debian-bugs-dist, but not to the submitter;
nnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org — these are also sent to the submitter
and forwarded to debian-bugs-dist, but not to the package maintainer;
nnn-maintonly@bugs.debian.org — these are only sent to the package
maintainer, not to the submitter or debian-bugs-dist;
nnn-quiet@bugs.debian.org — *these are only* filed in the bug tracking
system (as are all the *previous*), but not sent to anyone else.
Regards
David
Index: english/Bugs/Developer.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/Developer.wml,v retrieving revision 1.84 diff -u -r1.84 Developer.wml --- english/Bugs/Developer.wml 9 Sep 2011 21:15:01 -0000 1.84 +++ english/Bugs/Developer.wml 15 Dec 2011 22:19:00 -0000 @@ -73,33 +73,44 @@ header after forwarding the bug report. Please note that these are two distinct addresses.</p> -<p>If a developer wishes to reply to a bug report they should simply reply +<p> +Any developer wishing to reply to a bug report should simply reply to the message, respecting the <code>Reply-To</code> header. This will <strong>not</strong> close the bug.</p> -<p>The bug tracking system will -receive the message at <var>nnn</var><code>@bugs.debian.org</code>, pass it on to the -package maintainer, file the reply with the rest of the logs for that bug -report and forward it to <code>debian-bugs-dist</code>.</p> - -<p>Sending a message to <var>nnn</var><code>-submitter@bugs.debian.org</code> -will explicitly email the submitter of the bug and place a copy in the -Bug tracking system. The message will not be sent to package maintainer.</p> - -<p>If you wish to send a followup message which is not appropriate for -<code>debian-bugs-dist</code> you can do so by sending it to -<var>nnn</var><code>-quiet@bugs.debian.org</code> or -<var>nnn</var><code>-maintonly@bugs.debian.org</code>. -Mail to <var>nnn</var><code>-quiet@bugs.debian.org</code> is filed in the Bug Tracking -System but is not delivered to any individuals or mailing lists. Mail to -<var>nnn</var><code>-maintonly@bugs.debian.org</code> is filed in the Bug Tracking -System and is delivered only to the maintainer of the package in question.</p> - <p>Do <em>not</em> use the <q>reply to all recipients</q> or <q>followup</q> feature of your mailer unless you intend to edit down the recipients substantially. In particular, see that you don't send followup messages to <code>submit@bugs.debian.org</code>.</p> +<p> +Messages can be sent to the following addresses +in order to be filed in the bug tracking system: +</p> + +<ul> +<li> +<var>nnn</var><code>@bugs.debian.org</code> â?? such messages are also sent +to the package maintainer and forwarded to <code>debian-bugs-dist</code>, +but <strong>not</strong> to the submitter; +</li> +<li> +<var>nnn</var><code>-submitter@bugs.debian.org</code> â?? these are also sent +to the submitter and forwarded to <code>debian-bugs-dist</code>, +but <strong>not</strong> to the package maintainer; +</li> +<li> +<var>nnn</var><code>-maintonly@bugs.debian.org</code> â?? these are only sent +to the package maintainer, <strong>not</strong> to the submitter +or <code>debian-bugs-dist</code>; +</li> +<li> +<var>nnn</var><code>-quiet@bugs.debian.org</code> â?? these are only +filed in the bug tracking system (as are all the previous), but +<strong>not</strong> sent to anyone else. +</li> +</ul> + <p>For more information about headers to suppress ACK messages and how to send carbon copies using the Bug Tracking System, see the <a href="Reporting">instructions for reporting bugs</a>.</p>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature