Re: Errors in Bugs/server-control.wml?
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Bugs/server-control contains:
>
> <dt><code>archive</code> <var>bugnumber</var>
>
> <dd>Archives a bug that was previously archived if the bug fulfills
> the requirements for archival, ignoring time.
>
> This sounds strange to me. Should it be unarchived instead of archived?
No, this is correct.
> Does there exist other criteria, except time, for archival?
And no, time is not a factor for this command.
> Is it possible to archive a bug which was not yet archived in the
> past?
No, it's not.
> * Don, please try to write XHTML compliant code at least for new
> stuff, e.i. close tags properly.
Uh... those tags don't need to be closed, actually; I probably should
go through and close all of them, but I've just been following the
pre-existing examples.
Don Armstrong
--
[A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the
class of its potential falsifiers is not empty.
-- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ ??21
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: