[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#259078: marked as done (http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning: 132s/key/fingerprint/)



Your message dated Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:55:01 +0200
with message-id <20040715085501.GD10481@bretagne.cn>
and subject line Bug#259078: http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning: 132s/key/fingerprint/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2004 22:58:46 +0000
>From shaulk@013.net.il Mon Jul 12 15:58:46 2004
Return-path: <shaulk@013.net.il>
Received: from hori.barak.net.il (hori.barak-online.net) [212.150.48.121] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bk9l0-0001DQ-00; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:58:46 -0700
Received: from rakefet ([82.166.12.214]) by hori.barak-online.net
          (InterMail vK.4.04.00.03 201-232-140-20030416 license ddbfb5ca0577fb4501d00fa8328b2217)
          with ESMTP id <20040712225936.QTRK28748.hori@rakefet>;
          Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:59:36 +0300
Received: from shaul by rakefet with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1Bk9kS-0002xb-65; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:58:12 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Shaul Karl <shaulk@013.net.il>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning: 132s/key/fingerprint/
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:58:11 +0300
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Bk9kS-0002xb-65@rakefet>
Sender: Shaul Karl <shaulk@013.net.il>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

  We can use the last eight hex digits of the *fingerprint* in this and
other GnuPG operations and not the last eight hex digits of the *key*.
Or am I wrong?

--- keysigning.orig	2004-07-13 01:38:54.000000000 +0300
+++ keysigning		2004-07-13 01:38:59.000000000 +0300
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
 <pre>
        gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv-keys 0xDEADBEEF
 </pre>
-     <p>Note that we can use the last eight hex digits of the key in this and
+     <p>Note that we can use the last eight hex digits of the fingerprint in this and
      other GnuPG operations. The <tt>0x</tt> in front is also optional.</p>
      </li>
 <li> To sign the key, enter the edit menu with

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-4.pentium1.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 259078-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 08:55:04 +0000
>From pierre@machard.org Thu Jul 15 01:55:04 2004
Return-path: <pierre@machard.org>
Received: from caribou.techmag.info (caribou.migus.eu.org) [62.4.18.32] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bl219-0006eK-00; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:55:04 -0700
Received: from migus by caribou.migus.eu.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1Bl217-00037S-Vk; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:55:02 +0200
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:55:01 +0200
From: Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org>
To: Shaul Karl <shaulk@013.net.il>, 259078-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#259078: http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning: 132s/key/fingerprint/
Message-ID: <20040715085501.GD10481@bretagne.cn>
References: <[🔎] E1Bk9kS-0002xb-65@rakefet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jousvV0MzM2p6OtC"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1Bk9kS-0002xb-65@rakefet>
Organization: debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Pierre Machard <pierre@machard.org>
Delivered-To: 259078-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--jousvV0MzM2p6OtC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:58:11AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>=20
>   We can use the last eight hex digits of the *fingerprint* in this and
> other GnuPG operations and not the last eight hex digits of the *key*.
> Or am I wrong?

You are right. I've just fixed it in the CVS. It should be available on
our website in several hours.=20

Thanks,
--=20
                                Pierre Machard
<pmachard@debian.org>                                 http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87


--jousvV0MzM2p6OtC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9kZls6AtZiNwb4cRAgSlAKCulh6MTvDNJui4BS7coFcluRLlqACfTMkH
GdnYh2yujwXm3rljwdoWYyE=
=tmtw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jousvV0MzM2p6OtC--



Reply to: