Bug#99033: marked as done (packages.debian.org: packages.d.o/<source package> should work)
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:26:33 +0100
with message-id <20040219152633.GA1903@djpig.de>
and subject line You can search on source packages now at least
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2001 15:17:32 +0000
>From Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr Mon May 28 10:17:32 2001
Return-path: <Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr>
Received: from pixies.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.13.230]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 154Olv-0002Fq-00; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:17:32 -0500
Received: from mquinson by pixies.ens-lyon.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 154Olv-0003R2-00; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:17:31 +0200
From: Martin Quinson <Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr>
Subject: www.debian.org: http://packages.debian.org/<source package> should work
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <E154Olv-0003R2-00@pixies.ens-lyon.fr>
Sender: Martin Quinson <mquinson@pixies.ens-lyon.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:17:31 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20010528
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
This is just a feature request to have the url http://packages.debian.org/<source package>
work. ie, it should not only search for binary packages, but also for source ones.
The example I have in head is
http://packages.debian.org/gsl , which should point to all binary packages builded
from this source package, ie libgsl0 libgsl-dev, gsl-bin and gsl-ref-pdf.
I have no idea of how it could be implemented, though.
Bye, Mt.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux pixies 2.2.17-ide #1 Sat Sep 9 14:03:23 EST 2000 i686 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 99033-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2004 15:26:59 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Thu Feb 19 07:26:59 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Atq4p-00020b-00; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:26:59 -0800
Received: from pd9e390e1.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.144.225] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Atq4l-0008DF-00
for <99033-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:26:56 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Atq4Q-000424-00
for <99033-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:26:34 +0100
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:26:33 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 99033-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: You can search on source packages now at least
Message-ID: <20040219152633.GA1903@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 99033-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=4.0 tests=YOUTHERE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
X-Spam-Level: **
Hi.
You can search for source package names now on packages.debian.org
via the search form or http://packages.debian.org/src:<name>
I currently do not plan to implement searching for both binary
packages and source packages at once.
I think the main issue of this bug is done however so closing it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: