Bug#133280: marked as done (file list for aewm++ displays aewm files)
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:55:39 +0100
with message-id <20030130145539.GC1559@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#133280: wrong links at wmweather+ package page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2002 21:48:32 +0000
>From markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk Sun Feb 10 15:48:32 2002
Return-path: <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Received: from cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16a1po-0007VP-00; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 15:48:32 -0600
Received: from modem-2268.aardvark.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.8.220] helo=cloaked.freeserve.co.uk)
by cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0)
id 16a1pm-0005lX-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:48:31 +0000
Received: from markj by cloaked.freeserve.co.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16a1pj-0002Wg-00; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:48:27 +0000
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: packages.debian.org: Wrong package linked for file list
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54.1
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:48:27 +0000
Message-Id: <E16a1pj-0002Wg-00@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-10
Severity: normal
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/aewm++.html has a link to view
the list of files. Following this link brings up a listing of files for
aewm, not aewm++
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bouncing 2.4.17 #10 Tue Jan 22 22:40:52 GMT 2002 i586
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 133280-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2003 14:53:30 +0000
>From joy@gkvk.hr Thu Jan 30 08:53:30 2003
Return-path: <joy@gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18eG4I-00019Z-00; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 08:53:30 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18eG6N-0000XJ-00; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:55:39 +0100
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:55:39 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
To: Martin Godisch <martin@godisch.de>
Cc: 133280-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#133280: wrong links at wmweather+ package page
Message-ID: <20030130145539.GC1559@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20030129000525.GA17606@carlos.godisch.de> <[🔎] 20030129012130.GC20569@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 20030129081355.GA21574@carlos.godisch.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030129081355.GA21574@carlos.godisch.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 133280-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:13:56AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > > I reproduced bug #133280 with wmweather+ and Opera 6.11. If you can
> > > point me to the package page generating script, I'd like to help to
> > > fix this issue.
> >
> > Please see
> >
> > http://cvs.debian.org/packages/htmlscripts/?cvsroot=webwml
> > http://cvs.debian.org/packages/cgi-bin/?cvsroot=webwml
>
> The patch for search_contents.pl should fix the 'list of files' link,
> the one for pages.pl the 'other versions' link. Please test both.
They work! Thanks. This fixes the bug for aewm++, as well, of course.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: