* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org> [2003-01-23 13:05]: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:18:48AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> Just a question, why not having all the references in the same file? >> Why seperating them? The index is for all three ones the DSA number so >> you can do all the cross references in additional columns. >> > IMHO putting them all together is bloating the page. Also, we are > up-to-date with CVE references but other's have not been (yet) fully > revised. I believe it makes it also easier to CVE to determine if the > information they provide about us is correct. In any case a crude example > is attached (there's plenty of room for improvement, I kno) I meant it side-by-side, not one table after the other. Something along this lines: ,-----------.-----------------------------.--------------------------------. |DEBIAN DSA | Mitre CVE dictionary | Securityfocus Bugtraq database | |------------+-----------------------------+--------------------------------| |DSA-230 | CAN-2003-0012 CAN-2003-0013 | BID6501 BID6502 | `------------^-----------------------------^--------------------------------' Of course this is just an example, CERT and such should get it's own column added to the right. Have fun, Alfie -- ich habe bisher mit Windows + Word 97 gearbeitet. Jetzt möchte ich aber gerne auf Linus umsteigen und dazu hätte mich interessiert ob es ein Crossupdate gibt. Und zwar von Word 97 ( Windows ) auf Word 2000 ( für Linux ). -- GE_ST.praktikant1@DE.BOSCH.COM in news:d.c.o.u.l.m
Attachment:
pgpkoF7xI_Dfb.pgp
Description: PGP signature