[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: contact address for anti-harassment policies

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:00:25PM +0300, Erinn Clark wrote:
> > From other replies it seems to me that something like
> > "antiharassment@d.o" will be more acceptable. I'll wait for some more
> > feedback and then proceed requesting its creation as an alias initially
> > pointing to Amaya and Patty.
> I'm in favor of minimizing the scope for the reasons Zack mentioned
> and when there's some level of consensus I can setup the alias.

According to what I can see in this thread, there is consensus to create
a central contact point and also the volunteers to be behind it.
Nevertheless, while the proposal was about a @women.d.o address (which
Erinn is ready to set up), there has also been the proposal of using a
@d.o address (in which case it should be me requesting the alias setup
to DSA).

I see advantages and disadvantages (all minor) with both @women.d.o and
@d.o addresses.

It would be nice if people can comment further in which among the two
they prefer.


Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, |  .  |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: