Re: moving the wiki content?
On Saturday 11 July 2009 22:40:15 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:19:33PM +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
> > > Certainly the group has been coasting for a while, which isn't a
> > > problem by itself - but if it's now leading people to concede the main
> > > mailing lists to people who are behaving inappropriately, I think
> > > that's counterproductive.
> >
> > Even though I am currently unemployed and awaiting an operation, there
> > is no way I could keep up with all
> > the Debian mailing lists. I try to keep up with the low traffic on
> > this one but even so do miss topics here.
> > I try to keep up with the debian-perl and debian-devel lists but feel
> > I also miss topics there too.
> > Which would you consider to be the main Debian lists(s) to pay
> > attention to and why do you think behaviour on those lists is
> > inappropriate?
>
> For Debian development, debian-devel is the main general-purpose list that
> I was thinking of. debian-project may also qualify.
>
> I, personally, *don't* think the behavior on those lists is inappropriate
>
> (in the sense that we're discussing here), I was only reacting to this:
> > >> I think I am happier if we have our own 'quarter' where we can make it
> > >> absolutely clear
> > >> certain topics stuff are not welcome, nor tolerated and at least have
> > >> the expectation that we won't need to waste our time
> > >> explaining alternative viewpoints
>
> My point is that the kinds of topics that aren't tolerated on debian-women
> shouldn't be tolerated on debian-devel either, and I am very concerned that
> people not let debian-devel deteriorate on the grounds that debian-women is
> "good enough".
I thought that the inappropriate behaviour referred to was on Debian-user?
Lisi
Reply to: