also sprach martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> [2006.07.11.2254 +0200]:
> Why not subversion? I've looked at many in detail and the final
> round was between bzr, hg, git, and svn. bzr is too much in flux and
> missed some features I'd like to see, hg and bzr will eventually
> merge, git is too low level for my taste and was made for kernel
> development mainly, and subversion just works.
See this:
http://jelmer.vernstok.nl/blog/archives/129-Pushing-Mercurial-branches-into-Subversion-using-Bazaar.html
So you can use bzr to manage a SVN repository, which should make
Erinn happy.
I am excited about this development! Now all I have to find out is
whether SVN repositories and using bzr as the client is the way to
go. Or else I am going to regret spending all of today importing
most of my packages into subversion.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
"the unexamined life is not worth living"
-- platon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)