[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Next #d-women forum; topics anyone?



On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:44:42AM +0100, Dabian - TMPEMAIL valid 2004dec20 + 8 days wrote:
> tir, 2004-12-28 kl. 01:07 skrev Erinn Clark:
> > * Dabian [2004:12:28 00:38 +0100]: 
> > > man, 2004-12-27 kl. 14:14 skrev Helen Faulkner:
> > > > Thanks very much for allowing yourself to be volunteered to take the job, 
> > > > Matthew!  :)
> > > 
> > > Is it really nessesary to +m the channel?  I thought we did fine without
> > > moderation on the last meeting?  I agree its nice of you to volunteer 
> > > though.
> > 
> > Eh? We had a moderator at the last one -- Helen. I think perhaps you don't
> > understand what moderating is.
> 
> I guess my misunderstanding is either that the word means something else
> on freenode, or (us-american) english.  I have looked it up using the 
> dict command, and this is what I get:
> 
> 1 definition found
> 
> >From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
> 
>   moderate
> <CUT>
>       v 1: preside over; "John moderated the discussion" [syn: {chair},
>             {lead}]

This is the meaning of the word I was intending.  I don't think we need to
censor anyone in a #d-women discussion, as I presume we're all mature enough
to heed the topic of the meeting.  My intended role is as the facilitator of
the discussion only.

- Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: