Bug#713052: marked as done (RFP: kzorp -- KZorp is kernel space helper for application level gateways, especially Zorp)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:57:36 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <a3d49a73-85f-bf1a-d548-c3dde9a7643@alteholz.de>
and subject line link no longer works
has caused the Debian Bug report #713052,
regarding RFP: kzorp -- KZorp is kernel space helper for application level gateways, especially Zorp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
713052: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713052
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ITP: kzorp -- KZorp is kernel space helper for application level gateways, especially Zorp
- From: SZALAY Attila <sasa@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:33:12 +0200
- Message-id: <20130622073312.13440.52813.reportbug@mochrul.balabit>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: SZALAY Attila <sasa@debian.org>
* Package name : kzorp
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : BalaBit IT LTd.
* URL : https://github.com/balabit/kzorp
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : KZorp is kernel space helper for application level gateways, especially Zorp
Kzorp is a open source set of mechanisms to implement mixed packet
filter/application level gateway functionality on Linux.
Kzorp is used by Zorp, and anyone is welcome to use it with other gateways.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The link provided in this RFP no longer works. In case the software is maintained somewhere else, please open a new RFP with current information.
Thorsten
--- End Message ---
Reply to: