Bug#709237: marked as done (RFP: meta-suckless-tools -- meta-package installs simple commands for minimalistic window managers)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <b3e06ad3-4ea5-9144-4fe9-be53f8f01af7@alteholz.de>
and subject line no longer needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #709237,
regarding RFP: meta-suckless-tools -- meta-package installs simple commands for minimalistic window managers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
709237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709237
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Papchenkov <dmitry.papchenkoff@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
* Package name : meta-suckless-tools
Version : 39
Upstream Author : The Suckless Team
* URL : http://www.suckless.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description : meta-package installs simple commands for minimalistic window managers
I've splitted suckless-tools package becouse upstream ships all tools separately and this split will help to maintain and upgrade packages separately.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=DpRj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
As mentioned in the discussion, this bug is no longer needed and can be
closed.
Thorsten
--- End Message ---
Reply to: