[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#755034: marked as done (RFP: re6stnet -- Resilient, scalable, IPv6 network application)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <63bc5da9-b679-db2a-42d1-1c438bb8f55d@alteholz.de>
and subject line no longer needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #755034,
regarding RFP: re6stnet -- Resilient, scalable, IPv6 network application
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
755034: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>

* Package name    : re6stnet
  Upstream Author : Nexedi <re6stnet@erp5.org>
* URL             : http://re6st.net
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : Resilient, scalable, IPv6 network application

re6stnet creates a resilient, scalable, ipv6 network on top of an
existing ipv4 network, by creating tunnels on the fly, and then routing
targeted traffic through these tunnels.

re6stnet can be used to:

 - guarantee connectedness between computers connected to the internet,
   for which there exists a working route (in case the direct route
   isn't available).
 - create large networks
 - give ipv6 addresses to machines with only ipv4 available

Regards,
-- 
Arnaud Fontaine

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The link mentioned in this RFP does not work anymore. As IPv6 is available everywhere now, I don't think this software is needed. 
I am closing this RFP.

  Thorsten

--- End Message ---
Reply to: