[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#738674: marked as done (RFP: nancy -- lightweight framework for building HTTP based services in C#)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2025 06:50:17 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <88e38748-e197-7d3f-f58c-76c057f1b42a@alteholz.de>
and subject line upstream is dead
has caused the Debian Bug report #738674,
regarding RFP: nancy -- lightweight framework for building HTTP based services in C#
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
738674: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738674
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Control: block 738649 by -1

* Package name    : nancy
  Version         : 0.22.0
  Upstream Author : Andreas Håkansson, Steven Robbins and contributors
* URL             : http://nancyfx.org/
* License         : Expat
  Programming Lang: C#
  Description     : lightweight framework for building HTTP based services in C#

 Nancy is lightweight framework for building HTTP based services in C#.
 It is designed to handle DELETE, GET, HEAD, OPTIONS, POST, PUT and
 PATCH requests and provides a domain specific language for returning a
 response with just a couple of lines of code.

Regards
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Upstream is dead for a while and the repository was archived some time ago. I don't think this software should be part of Debian, so I am closing this RFP. 

 Thorsten

--- End Message ---
Reply to: