Hi, Quoting Martin Dosch (2025-08-12 00:48:31) > >So why not instead of packaging the 2-line wofi-emoji or the 100-line > >shmoji > >package https://github.com/fdw/rofimoji which seems to support everything that > >wofi-emoji or shmoji can do and can do more, supports more selectors, can load > >the emoji data from other files and can insert the emoji and supports > >clipboards of different display managers. The project also has nearly 1000 > >stars on github and is thus orders of magnitude more popular than the other two > >projects. > > > >What do you think? > > That would be great, I would not enforce wofi-emoji if a good > alternative would already be packaged. But python is also a language > where I don't feel comfortable to maintain a package. would you drop packaging wofi-emoji if I were to package rofimoji? Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature