[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1101803: marked as done (RFP: salut)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:32:01 +0800
with message-id <d8315c5da1af24e3fd6576d1f8b8e84c334de79a.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1101803: RFP: salut
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101803,
regarding RFP: salut
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1101803: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101803
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: salut
Version: 1.0
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.10
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-32-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_SG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_SG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_SG:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
The RFP was not filed correctly and there is no link provided to this
software.
--
Maytham

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: