Bug#1059618: Please consider packaging ssh3 as soh

[Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>]

Hi

I also think it would be nice to upload, but upstream didn’t really make a decision as far as I can tell.

https://github.com/francoismichel/ssh3/issues/79

Maybe you could explain to upstream that this would get packaged if they did the renaming and a new release?

Shipping it as “soh” if that isn’t where upstream is going seems potentially worse than just waiting a bit more to let upstream make some decision. If they already abandoned the project, maybe it doesn’t make sense to package it at all.

/Simon

6 feb. 2025 kl. 13:24 skrev Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it>:

Hi Simon,

Could you please consider packaging "ssh3" as "soh"?

Upstream has already agreed to the rename, it just hasn't been done yet. You wouldn't even need to write the patch yourself, as a pull request performing the rename has been opened already at <https://github.com/francoismichel/ssh3/pull/96>.

I think having soh in Debian would be great.

Bye!