On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:52:00PM +0530, Prasanna Venkadesh wrote: > > > On 15 May 2024 12:33:49 am IST, Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> wrote: > >On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 06:31:16PM +0000, Prasanna Venkadesh wrote: > >> It seems, there is no packaging team available yet for Nim lang. > >> I am not looking for co-maintainers, it's not complex. > > > >There does exist a nim team. > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/nim-team > > Oh! I couldn't find the team in this wiki https://wiki.debian.org/Teams > > In that case, I would like the package to be managed under the team. I also notice that the package names for libraries follow nim-* pattern. > > How about hybrids, when its both a CLI app & a library? I suppose you need to name a package in a way that has more weight. Is it more likely to be used by end users as a library or application? Name the source package based on what makes more sense. As for battinfo, it makes more sense to have an application name (battinfo instead of nim-battinfo). > > What are my next steps? You could contact the owners of nim team to grant you access to the salsa namespace. If there's too much delay/you are in a hurry, you could use another namespace for now. Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature