[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1064508: RFP: ior -- parallel storage IO benchmark



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
User: storage@unige.ch
Usertags: unige.ch-storage

* Package name    : ior
  Version         : 3.3.0
  Upstream Contact: Los Alamos National Laboratory
                    (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
                      William Loewe <loewe6@llnl.gov>,
                      Tyce McLarty <mclarty3@llnl.gov>,
                      Christopher Morrone <morrone2@llnl.gov>)
* URL             : https://github.com/hpc/ior
                    (https://github.com/LLNL/ior)
* License         : GPL-2
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : parallel storage IO benchmark
   IOR is a parallel IO benchmark that can be used to test the performance
   of parallel storage systems using various interfaces and access
   patterns.
   .
   The IOR package also includes the mdtest benchmark which specifically
   tests the peak metadata rates of storage systems under different
   directory structures.
   .
   Both benchmarks use a common parallel I/O abstraction backend and rely on
   MPI for synchronization.

I have just packaged it, since I need it for a short-lived HPC project I
am working on as part of the storage team at the University of Geneva
(Switzerland).

However, given that I do not plan to continue to use it after this
project, I wonder if someone else would like to maintain it, probably as
part of the "Debian Science Distributed Computing packages" (Cc:ed)?

  <https://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/distributedcomputing>

I will provide the packaging sources once this bug get a number.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

-- 
Dr. Luca Capello
Ingénieur stockage | Recherche et Information Scientifique
Division du Système et des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication
Université de Genève | 66, Boulevard Carl-Vogt | 1205 Genève
Tél +41 22 379 77 69 | Bureau D624
mailto:luca.capello@unige.ch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: