Hi David, * David Bremner <david@tethera.net> [2023-11-24 08:49]:
Great, see also
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039923
if you were not aware.
I am aware, and it is my ultimate goal to package SCIP. :)
There seems to be no patching needed to get the full scipoptsuite to build under sid (or even bullseye). I have not carefully examined what external software is embedded in the source. There seem to be a few things under papilo (presolver); I'm not sure if that is used by soplex or only by scip.
There are a few external dependencies, but nothing too daunting.More importantly though, all three of PaPILO, SoPlex, and SCIP can potentially be linked against each other. In order to avoid circular dependencies, I came to the conclusion that SCIP should be linked against both PaPILO and SoPlex, PaPILO should probably be linked against SoPlex, and SoPlex should be built standalone.
If you think otherwise, I'd be happy to hear your thoughts. Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature