On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 17:48:41 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Sorry to be a pain again :) but: Do we really need this?
>
> Unfortunately yes for me, it is in the dep chain for Geo::GDAL::FFI, as for
> https://wiki.debian.org/BookwormGdalPerl
> which is my main goal to avoid to mantain an unofficial repo for the rest
> of time.
You mean because of Alien::gdal?
I can't really test now, because Geo::GDAL::FFI also needs the
unpackaged FFI::Platypus::Declare, but from reading
https://metacpan.org/release/AJOLMA/Geo-GDAL-FFI-0.1/source/Makefile.PL
and
https://metacpan.org/release/AJOLMA/Geo-GDAL-FFI-0.1/source/README.md
a simple
override_dh_auto_configure:
dh_auto_configure -- GDAL=/usr
plus build dependencies on gdal-bin (for /usr/bin/gdalinfo) and libgdal-dev
might be enough without any Alien::gdal. Maybe :)
(Not sure about
https://metacpan.org/release/AJOLMA/Geo-GDAL-FFI-0.1/source/lib/Geo/GDAL/FFI.pm#L1567
but this is also guarded by an if())
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
`-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature