[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036226: ITP: libe131 -- library for the E1.31 (sACN) protocol



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Geiger <matthias.geiger1024@tutanota.de>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, matthias.geiger1024@tutanota.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

* Package name    : libe131
  Version         : 1.4.0
  Upstream Contact: Hugo Hromic <hhromic@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/hhromic/libe131.git
* License         : Apache-2.0
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : library for the  E1.31 (sACN) protocol

I intend to package libe131. It's one of the libraries needed to 
devendor Openrgb. Fron the description: 

>This is a lightweight C/C++ library that provides a simple API for packet, 
> client and server programming to be used for communicating with devices
> implementing the E1.31 (sACN) protocol. 

This protocol is appearantly used to control lighting devices.

The packaging is already done and can be viewed at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libe131.

I'd need a sponsor for the initial upload.

regards,

werdahias

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/256
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: