[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#927076: xournalpp packaging in Debian: how can we help?



Hello Barak,

I'm glad to see that you are still progressing in the packaging of
xournalpp. Last year, you said that the main show stopper was the svg
licenses, that were unclear. But if I understand correctly, you fixed
it too with the following commit.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xournalpp/-/commit/c58bef48700738fc05e48bc1d4f61cf3830f708c

Now, the debian/copyright file looks good to me. Am I right? Is there
anything else that should be done, or are we only waiting for the
Debian release before you can upload this package to unstable? How
could we help?

I have another question about the version of xournalpp that you are
packaging. It seems to me that you are tracking upstream master,
right? Wouldn't it be preferable to track released versions instead?
I'm unsure here as I did not dig into upstream releasing policy, so my
first feeling may well be wrong.

Finally, would you mind if I change what should be on the repo to
activate the automatic build pipelines from
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline ? That would give us
the packages as build artefact, so that I can use your version of the
package without building locally ;)

Thanks for all the good job done here,
Mt.

-- 
The great thing about TCP jokes is that you always get them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: